Part 1, the Church
itself is responsible for perpetrating the most enduring and
damaging cover-up in regard to abductions.
Beyond this, in accordance with
prophecies made by Peter, Paul and Jesus Christ himself, they
invented a completely false doctrine about the "proper
Genesis 6. This
heresy has robbed both the churched and unchurched from any hope of
understanding the truth behind abductions. In short, Jews and
early Christians knew full well that angels did, could and would
abduct humans for the purposes of sex and hybridization, BUT
these same texts also gave safeguards against such assault.
This rogue element of the early
church (sort of an early Catholic
Majestic 12, if you will)
has left moderns at the mercy of a phenomenon they have no hope of
understanding or defending themselves against. Today's society is
doomed to repeat the errors of our ancient ancestors, by once again
falling prey to the Watchers' sorceries and claims of divinity.
Already, far too many are under the sway of
UFO cults, claiming that
they are led by "spirit-guides here to help humanity." Many more
"normal" individuals in the world of scientific UFO research and
supposedly the world's governments merely defer to their technology,
by assuming the Watchers are a superior race from the stars. Citing
Ezekiel 3:18 (while I'm making enemies anyway) allow me to also
charge that the blood, the wrecked lives, and the eternal damnation
of all souls who have fallen victim to either abductions or
deceptive philosophies is on the hands of those who perpetrated -
and today with knowledge maintain - these deceptive doctrines.
I realize these are astounding and
damning claims, and I would not make them without offering
sufficient proof. Because of the incorrect (but widely taught in
seminaries) "Sons of Seth" interpretation of Genesis 6 introduced
around 400 A.D., Christians start out at a disadvantage when
studying the topic. For this reason, these arguments will be offered
in a way meant to challenge and convince the Christian believer of
these claims. Then, we'll look over other texts which received "the
Enoch treatment." As made clear elsewhere on this site, I still
maintain a belief in and respect for the integrity of scripture (the
original languages that is) as God's inspired word. The problem here
is that God's inspired word has been intentionally misrepresented by
those entrusted to teach it.
The Sons of Seth Heresy
Beginning around 400 A.D., portions
of the church began to take an unusual stand against the angelic
interpretation of Genesis 6. Rather than teaching what the text
clearly says (especially when examined in Hebrew, below), and what
had been the Orthodox Jewish and early Christian view for all time
previous, the idea was introduced that this passage "really"
referred to the lineages of Cain and Seth, the surviving sons of
Adam. They said it simply means that the "rebellious" lines of Cain
were marrying the "faithful" descendants of Seth. The unfounded
presumption of this theory is that ALL of Seth's descendants were
godly, while ALL of Cain's were rebellious. While a sketchy pattern
can be drawn from Genesis, it is really a ridiculous injustice to
the concept of free will and of God's dealing with individuals to
dogmaticly hold to this position. It further implies that Sethites
were somehow immune to the effects of the Fall itself.
Conspiracy aside, the angelic
interpretation itself rather assaults the sensibilities of even
those good men throughout the ages who would be tempted to
apologetically shirk from believing and teaching God's word as
innerrant truth. As J Timothy Unruh says "Modern Christians have
often attempted to make this passage in Genesis more
palatable intellectually by explaining the 'sons of God' as
Sethites and the 'daughters of men' as Cainites, with their union
representing the breaking down of the wall of separation between
believers and unbelievers." (1) Ultimately, this position simply
does not "hold water" under even casual study. (A brief but in-depth
analysis of the Sons of Seth theory is online
here, posted by researcher
and author Chuck Missler. Because of this, I will only touch on the
relevant points continuing from Unruh's book, published earlier and
available to be read online in it's entirety
Those who hold to the humanistic
Sethite explanation have never been able to suggest a sufficient
reason (or even a lame one actually) as to why the children of one
"immoral" parent would be physical giants however, IF both parents
were otherwise normal humans. While the angelic abduction scenario
seems more like science fiction to today's intellectual Christian,
the Sethite doctrine is actually easily revealed to be the fantasy!
The exact term "sons of God"
(B'nai haElohim in Hebrew) used in Genesis 6:1-4, is used
also in Job 1:6, 2:1 & 38:7 always referring to angels.
Unfortunately, many competent Bible scholars of today still believe
the "sons of God" are of human lineage. This is simply because it
has been taught in seminaries for centuries, thanks to the deceptive
and radically unsound doctrinal shift introduced by the church at
this point in history.
Unruh continues, "The actual
expression 'sons of God' occurs explicitly three other
times (in Job, above)... and in each case the term refers
indisputably to angelic beings.... There are as well implicit
references to these sons of God in a number of other passages. There
is no doubt in these passages the meaning applies exclusively to
angels... A very similar term bar elohim is used in Daniel
3:25, and refers either to an angel or a theophany (ie, an
appearance of God before the incarnation in Christ). The term 'sons
of the mighty' (bene elim) is used in Psalm 29:1 and also
Psalm 89:6, and again refers to angels. The sons of Elohim the
mighty creator are confined to those creatures made directly
by the Divine hand, and not born of other beings of their
own order." (1) Any amount of honest research into this topic will
turn up the same findings, that someone (or some being...) from
within the 3rd - 5th century church did a great violence to the
literal reading of the text in concocting the Sethite theory.
Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum, reknowned
Judaic scholar and one of the foremost authorities on the nation of
Israel, agrees almost ver batim with this assessment, in his work
While many who support the Sethite doctrine argue that the ENGLISH
phrase son(s) of God is referred to in the Bible as simply meaning
"believers" in general, there is a world of difference between the
Old and New Testament use of this term. In the New Testament sense,
the term is applied to those who have become "sons
of God" through their faith in Christ, but by adoption (Romans 8 ; 1
Fruchtenbaum writes "The term 'sons
of God' is a general term which means 'to be brought into existence
by God's creative act.' Because the term carries this meaning,
it is used very selectively. Throughout the Old
Testament the term 'sons of God' is always used of angels. But some
want to make Gen 6:1-4 the one exception, and there is simply no
warrant for making an exception here. In the New Testament the term
'sons of God' is expanded. Adam is called the son of God (Luke 3:38)
because he was brought into existence by creation. Believers are
called sons of God (John 1:12) because believers are considered to
be a new creation (Galtians 6:15). But in Genesis, the text is
dealing with a specific Hebrew expression, benei elohim, and, as it
is used in the Hebrew Old Testament, it is a term that is always
used of angels. The distinction in this passage then is not
between Sethites and Cainites, but between humanity and angels."
Fruchtenbaum, Unruh, Huie, Missler
and other modern authors all offer similar academic works on these
subjects, all citing the same
Old & New Test passages to
put forth sound and extensive rebuttals to many other objections
frequently offered in defense of the Sethite interpretation, or
other claims of some "human lineage." The point here though
is that the Sethite theory introduced to (unleashed upon) the
Christian mindset by the Church at this time clearly denies the
truth of Scripture. As Missler rightly asserts "There is no
basis for restricting the text to either subset of Adam's
descendants... The entire view is contrived on a series of
assumptions without Scriptural support...
"The "Sons of Elohim" saw the
daughters of men that they were fair and took them wives of all that
they chose. It appears that the women had little say in the matter.
The domineering implication hardly suggests a godly approach to the
union. Even the mention that they saw that they were attractive
seems out of place if only normal biology was involved. And were the
daughters of Seth so unattractive? ... If the lines of Seth were so
faithful, why did they perish in the flood?" (3)
Implanting these false doctrines,
which survive to this day, was a long battle which some determined
force from within the Church finally accomplished, and Origen and
other faithful men paid the ultimate price by being labeled
heretics, exiled and/or even publicly burned to initiate and execute
this great "cover up." (This tragic history is catalogued in E.C.
Fallen Angels & The Origins of Evil;
Why Church Fathers Supressed The Book of Enoch,
but see also my disclaimers to her work in the review at right).
This pseudo-theology eventually
succeeded in becoming the official church dogma however, surviving
even to today's Bible institutions, despite the fact that the
rest of the canon affirms
the angelic interpretaion many times over.
It is worth noting before moving on,
that the Bible is far from the only ancient source that makes the
argument that angels interbred with humans. The entire pantheon of
Greco-Roman mythology is the same story retold, but romanticized by
cultures who were deceived by these so-called "gods"
who mated with human women to produce Hercules, etc. "The Book of
Antiquities" (which you'll find in the study of almost any pastor
you ask) by ancient historian Flavius Josephus also tells us that
angelic hybridization produced the "Titans" of Greco-Roman culture,
as shown from
posted online by Bryan T. Huie
(btw... that Greek word "Titanos," which was eventually translated
from the Greek version of the Hebrew OT to give us "giant"
in the King James Version, can also be translated "grey."
Just some food for thought). Josephus writes:
now showed by their actions a double degree of wickedness; whereby
they made God to be their enemy, for many angels* of God accompanied
with women and begat sons that proved unjust, and despisers of all
that was good, on account of the confidence they had in their own
strength; for the tradition is, that these men did what resembled
the acts of those whom the Grecians called giants. But Noah was very
uneasy at what they did..."
Continuing from Huie's
webpage - * "This notion, that the fallen angels were, in some sense
the fathers of the old giants, was the constant opinion of
As you can see, Josephus believed and recorded that
"the sons of God" mentioned in Genesis 6 were fallen angels.
As Whitson's footnote acknowledges, this belief was standard in the
"Another well-known first
century Jewish writer, Philo of Alexandria, shared Josephus' views
on this topic. In his work "On the Giants," Philo wrote: "And when
the angels of God saw the daughters of men that they were beautiful,
they took unto themselves wives of all them whom they chose.'
Those beings, whom other philosophers call demons, Moses
usually calls angels..."
(The Works of Philo, "De Gigantibus," translated by
C.D. Yonge, p. 152)
"As shown above, the
evidence that "the sons of God" mentioned in Genesis 6 are fallen
angels is substantial. By their sexual immorality, these angels
produced offspring which were strong and violent. The concept of a
race of giants which resulted from the union of gods and humans is
virtually universal in the world's early civilizations." (4)
The "conspiracy" from within the
Church quite literally changed the history of the world - both it's
past, and it's future. Julius Africanus, St. Augustine and many
others debunked and destroyed every document relating to the angelic
invasion to successfully promote their "weather balloon / crash
dummy" Sethite fallicy. Before long Christianity itself would
eventually erode from being a dynamic, living, supernatural faith in
a miracle working God to become merely "the new intellectualism,"
whose seat had moved from Athens to Rome.
The errors and ungodliness of the
political elite who succeeded the 1st and 2nd century church's
apostles, evangelists and martyrs are lamented elsewhere. But as
this system began to promote the "mediation" of the priesthood (1
Tim 2:5), and as the doctrines of men (?) came to replace belief in
the Word of God (Mark 6-8, 13), the then "Western world" spiraled
downward into it's Dark Ages. The carefully chronicled histories of
the ancients became known first as mythology, then finally as
Saturday morning cartoons, and our race quite simply forgot about
But it's out there. In July 1947,
about an hour outside of Roswell, New Mexico, the gods of old
returned to find a basicly God-fearing, Mom & apple pie loving kind
of 1940's Americana culture - but one that had also just harnessed
the most destructive force the world had ever seen, and who now held
the undisputed title of "world champion superpower."
And thanks to the old church's now
forgotten "cover-up" of the truth behind fiery chariots and
abductions, we'd have NO CLUE as to what had just landed in our back
But God did.
On the other side of the world,
among a nearly forgotten people group that was - by destiny's clock
- just seconds away from rejoining the fray of the mighty nations of
the world, a goofy little kid chased his pet sheep into a cave. And
on an otherwise normal hot summer's day in 1948, he walked out with
the archeological find of the millenium.
A clay jar filled with some
scrolls. Among them of course, were fragments from the book of Enoch.
As a matter of course, the Vatican
paid top dollar for them.
"And I heard,
but I understood not: then I said,
Oh my Lord, what shall be the end of these things?
"And the angel
said, Go thy way Daniel:
for the words are closed up and sealed
till the time of the end.
"Many shall be
purified, and made white, and tried;
but the wicked shall do wickedly;
and none of the wicked shall understand;
but the wise
End of the book of
Daniel (ch 12 v 8-10)
Chapter 10: 4-5 And Thou knowest how the Watchmen (fallen angels),
the fathers of these spirits, acted in my day; And these spirits
also which are alive, cast them into prison and hold them in the
places of judgment, And let them not destroy the sons of thy
servant, my God, For they are terrible and created for destroying;
and may they not rule over the spirits of the living;
For Thou alone knowest their
judgment. And let them have no sway over the children of righteous
from now on and to eternity.
the Book of Jasher
And their judges
and rulers went to the daughters of men and took their wives by
force (rape) from their husbands according to their choice, And the
sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the
beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture
of animals of one species with the other, In order to provoke the
According to Pastor
of Demons" page,
"Demons are the
disembodied spirits of the Giants (Nephilim). The 'Mighty Men of
Renown' are the Gibborim created by the Watchers when they left
their heavenly abode and came down to the daughters of men as
recorded in Genesis Chapter 6:4 of the Old Testament. They are half
breeds, angelic hybrids, the Titans.
The word in Greek - "titanos" - means greys.
When fallen angels
shape-shift into a form of human being they can have intercourse but
not without some aberrant genetic changes. The union of these beasts
with humans produced children that were different in many ways. The
first apparent difference was that they developed giantism. They
were giants or Nephilim. Og the King of Bashan had a bed that was 13
to 15 feet long; and Goliath was 6 cubits tall (9 feet). The second
aberration was that they had six fingers and six toes...
"The aberrant genetic
tendencies of the Nephilim were unfortunately cloned into the D.N.A.
of mankind. According to the Bible, only Noah escaped this genetic
intervention at the time. There are no records of these perverse
tendencies prior to the intervention of the Watchers. These dormant
genetic tendencies still surface today at times in different people
... The Watchers are a guardian class of angels that were assigned
to watch over the earth and protect mankind from just this sort of
According to the Bible, the Book of Enoch, Jubilees,
Jasher, and Testimony of the Twelve Patriarchs, they rebelled
against God and attempted to enslave the whole world and provoke
According to the Book of Jasher they not only tweaked
with the D.N.A. of mankind but also with the animals. They may have
produced such beasts as the Pegasus, Minotaur, the unicorn, and the
There are some
scholars that speculate that one day this will happen again to
produce the antichrist. Fallen angels will make love to women and
back breed until they have genetically produced a creature that is
fully fallen angel and fully man. A bastard angelic incarnation.
This may be an explanation for the reported cases of 'alien'
abduction. If alien abductions are really happening then we know the
source and the purpose. The source is fallen angels and the purpose
is to breed the antichrist -- Satan incarnate.
Jesus said, "But as
the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man
be." (Matthew 24:37). How were the days of Noah? They were violent
and according to 2 Peter verse 2 these are the days that the angels
fell and were judged. According to Jude 6 these are the days that
the angels fell and some were chained in Tartarus.