Government Disclose the Existence of Aliens and UFO's?
Should the government disclose the existence of aliens and UFOs? When it's time, maybe perhaps. I know a lot of people are furious the
government hasn't revealed what it knows. Yet, sometimes the truth is better
left unsaid, or is it? You decide.
The following interview will reveal what most of us who have followed and
researched this facade already know and the truth is terrible. The truth is
demented. The truth is shocking, because not only does it reveal the intent and
actions of aliens on earth, it reveals the government's own complicity in
covering it up, even to the extent of making a treaty allowing it to happen in
exchange for technology. It created a bigger problem then they could ever
imagine. Although the media and local law enforcement have worked in collusion
with the government in covering up these heinous crimes against humanity for
over 60 years, how much longer can they?
regarding the extraterrestrial presence is too disturbing and too dangerous for
public consumption and should be withheld until such time as the government
feels the public can deal with the facts" Art Bell
he right or wrong? You Decide. Highlights from the interview: Quotations are
1. Every year over 300,000 children are missing,
not to mention the adults that are far under-reported to be missing as well. In
fact out of 300,000 plus people a year, how many did you hear about from the
media? The only ones you will hear about are the ones the media are sure don't
involve strange circumstances, such as a UFO. (the children are used as food,
the adults are used as food as well but the majority of adults are used for
alien-human breeding via genetic engineering through abductions.)
Since 1938 we've
lost over 200 aircraft due to UFO hostilities and thousands of soldiers in all
kinds of different actions with aliens. Since that time several hundred
thousand civilians have disappeared with no trace.
3. Several thousand
people have been eliminated by the government because of their chance encounters
with the aliens of which the government could not risk being publicized. (so not
only do we have hundreds of thousands of people missing from the aliens, our
government is killing thousands of people as well to keep them quiet of their
knowledge or UFO encounters).
A slightly more
frightening phenomena known as "human mutilations" have occurred on a regular
basis and are similar to "cattle mutilations". In that the human or humans are
taken from the street, so to speak, and returned to the same area about 45
minutes to an hour later with their rectums cored out, their genitals removed,
eyes removed from their sockets, and completely drained of blood. In all cases
it appeared that the mutilation procedures occurred while the persons were still
alive and conscious. (Hear about this in the media ever?)
occur on a daily basis throughout the United States to at least 10% of the
population. (This is a small fraction compared to the rest of the world that is
experiencing the same thing. In the United States Alone, over 3 million people
every 10 years disappear or completely vanish by the aliens, this doesn't
include those who are abducted, chip implanted for future tracking purposes, and brought back).
When we (government)
were first made aware of this (the mutiliations and abductions) we protested to
the little gray being we had held in captivity at the YY-2 facility in Los
Alamos, but a deal was struck that in exchange for advanced technology from the
aliens we (government) would allow them to abduct a very small number of
persons and we would periodically be given a list of those persons abducted. We
got something less than the technology we bargained for and
abductions exceeded by a million fold than what we had naively agreed to.
7. The implication
here is that this information would cause people to turn away from God. It is
more likely to turn people toward God "It became apparent" is not exactly a
convincing measure of certitude. Many things will become apparent to many
people, assuming, of course, they are included. The influencing of religion
would be an interesting component. It would take far more specifics than what
is presented here to sway committed members of formal religions. And alien
miracles aside, unless these fine off-planet beings can explain their
whereabouts prior to the big bang, those comfortable with a creator god will
have no trouble incorporating these interfering imps into their faith.
[Lear] This so unnerved Eisenhower that he had "In God We Trust" put on paper
money and coins and put in the Pledge of Allegiance to reaffirm the public
belief in God. (The Bible already tells us who they are and where they came
from, so WHY is the government worried that people would lose their faith in
God? The only conspiracy and lies are the ones the aliens themselves are
spewing, and those are the ones the government needs to be exposing for the lies
they are, not hiding! Why does the government refuse to accept this as a
religious issue? After all, it has nothing to do with politics! They just want
to corner the alien facade without God because then THEY would have to proclaim
HE exists and throw out their evolution, atheism, and Lucifer worship!!)
8. We set up
operations in Pine Gap, Australia to preclude any prying eyes figuring out what
we were up to. We regularly eliminated through extreme prejudice anybody
who was part of the operation and made the least little tiny threat about
disclosure or dissatisfaction with the operation.
And even if you give
us the go ahead to spill the beans to the public it's unlikely they will get
anything more than "yes, we recovered a flying saucer and yes, there was an
occupant" but that's all we're gonna tell ya.
interview was on Coast to Coast AM on November 2 , 2003.
John Lear Briefing
Aviator and researcher, John Lear's, intriguing November 2 appearance on Coast
to Coast AM with Art Bell was rebroadcast on November 30. [Reminder: Stephen
Bassett's response to John Lear's hypothetical scenario ("yes" or "no" to
disclosure) is posted at: : www.paradigmclock.com/paradigmarticlesindex.html ]
The John Lear Briefing Scenario: Why the Answer is "Yes."
Washington, DC - On November 12, 2003, researcher and accomplished aviator,
John Lear, appeared on Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell. John Lear is a most
interesting man, and it was a most interesting evening.
The son of the famous creator of the Lear Jet, William Lear, John is a former
Lockheed L-1011 Captain. He has flown over 150 test aircraft and has received
every certification granted by the Federal Aviation Administration. He also
holds 18 world speed records and has worked for 28 different Aircraft
Corporations. During the late 1960's, 1970's and early 1980's he was a
contract pilot for the CIA.
>From 1985 to 1992 John plunged into a personal investigation of
extraterrestrial related phenomena. He was a friend of Robert Lazar and was on
hand when Lazar broke with his Area 51 employer and began speaking out about
extraordinary craft of possible extraterrestrial origin being worked on at that
After seven years of research Lear stepped back from the fray admitting he was
frustrated and burned out. He had paid a heavy price for his efforts, losing
two jobs and receiving various intimidations. His research was conducted
during the last years of the Cold War, when the United States government was
fully intent on maintaining the "cover-up," and few insiders were breaking
ranks. Lear went public with his overall findings and then withdrew from the
field and the limelight. The legacy of Lear's work lived on in mail lists and
websites. Eleven years passed. Then he turned up on Art Bell with a message.
The message was in the form of a question and has come to be referred to as the
John Lear Briefing Scenario. It has been circulated extensively on the
Internet. Lear asked Art to pretend the U.S. Government had selected Art Bell
to make the disclosure decision after being fully briefed on the facts
surrounding the extraterrestrial presence. As it happens, John had presented
the same scenario to me the night before his appearance on Coast to Coast AM
with Bell. If these are the facts, do you authorize disclosure to the people -
yay or nay?
I answered, "yes." Bell answered, "no." Lear agreed with Bell.
Art's response was consistent with the position he has held on disclosure and
repeated on his program over the years - the truth regarding the
extraterrestrial presence is too disturbing and too dangerous for public
consumption and should be withheld until such time as the government feels the
public can deal with the facts. And to his credit, Art acknowledged some would
find this position conflicted for a man who had devoted years developing a
program dedicated to providing alternative information to its listeners. But
that's the way he felt.
I requested an opportunity to come on Coast to Coast AM with Art or George Noory
and offer the reasons why the answer to John Lear's Briefing Scenario must be
"yes." In the meantime, here are the arguments for a "yes" response to the
Lear Briefing Scenario.
First we need to consider the matter of "secondhand information" (or thirdhand,
fourth-hand.). In criminal law it is referred to as "hearsay," and most of you
know it is not admissible in court except under specific circumstances. What
someone tells you may or may not be true - and that extends to
extraterrestrials. Just because they have really, really hot vehicles and can
pass through walls, doesn't mean they can't lie.
There are many scenarios. Just about every researcher has one - a well
intentioned effort to describe the "big picture." It's irresistible. You draw
on everything you have heard, read and seen, and much of it is secondhand.
To be fair, in John Lear's posited scenario you are asked to assume the
information to be absolutely true, then make your decision. This is fine for
the purpose of a thought experiment. In the non-experimental, real world it is
not practical. In making a decision of such magnitude the truth or falsity of
the information is of no small importance.
For those, then, who wish to use this scenario as a basis for making the real
world argument against disclosure, consider this: after 56 years of research in
the modern era of ufology, there are a few certainties you can take to the
bank. Two of these are: 1) there is an extraterrestrial presence engaging the
human race, and 2) no one in the field of extraterrestrial related phenomena
research/activism knows the big picture. No one has it right. If they are well
intentioned and paying attention, they very likely have some of it right, a
piece here and there. And if you took all the correct pieces from all the
researchers, you might have a mosaic which came close to the truth.
And the reason this is so is that everyone's big picture, however awful or
sanguine, is composed in large measure of secondhand information, hearsay, and
much of it is simply not true. Not true because of government dispensed
disinformation, well intentioned misinterpretation, outright hoaxes by private
parties, simple mistake, delusion and even alien mendacity.
Thus it is that any decision to delay the truth process based upon any posited
scenario has the profound deficiency of being based upon a substantial portion
of false information. In other words, because of the cover-up it is not
possible to establish a fully valid scenario. Without a valid scenario we
cannot decide to end the cover-up. This is not a circular argument the human
race can afford.
Without the comfort of a valid big picture scenario, it is necessary to fall
back upon first principals. There are many, but one stands out. Does the human
race wish to move forward in ignorance and fear driven by government imposed
information embargoes or advance with as much truth as can be wrung from
science, common sense and government files?
There have been many arguments put forth in many forums for disclosure. They
would fill a dozen articles. Most of you have read or heard many over the
years. Let's take another tack. For those who may feel this response has been
begging the question, let's take the heart of John Lear's Briefing Scenario and
answer it piece by piece. [Lear's scenario is shown in blue font.]
[Lear] So here's what happened, Art. We'll use some videos and stills. Our
first UFO recoveries were in the late '30s. We made a couple in the beginning of
the '40s and then came Roswell, which the public found out about.
[Bassett] The Roswell case already approaches a 100% public awareness quotient
in the U.S. and is considered a likely crashed UFO by a majority of Americans.
Learning there were other crashed vehicles will be much like learning other U.S.
corporations are cooking their books.
[Lear] We got 2 live aliens from Roswell. One died shortly there after and one
lived till 1956. And we found out so far there are 18 different alien species
that we know about monitoring Earth.
[Bassett] Fifty percent of the polled public already believes some UFOs are
alien craft with aliens in them. Eighteen species? This is probably
preferable to one species. It only confirms the galaxy to be teeming with
life. The human race is one of eighteen (hundreds? thousands? millions?) of
sentient life forms. They know about you, but you don't know about them,
because a small cabal of men operating in secret believe they know what is best
for the rest of humanity.
[Lear] Some are good and some are hostile, most are indifferent.
[Bassett] This describes every nation's tourists. No one would expect it to be
[Lear] We found out that we are the experimental product, if you will, of an
alien race who we never met and we don't know who they are.
[Bassett] The implication is genetic engineering and not the creation of life
itself by aliens from inorganic matter, which if true, would be challenging, but
in either case is not provable.
[Lear] All we know is that the Grays are cybernetic organisms, glorified robots
if you will, who work here at the behest of their employers monitoring us
[Bassett] A cybernetic organism was just elected the Governor of California.
The issue of abductions is now in the public domain. A good case can me made
that more damage will occur to abductees, if the truth process is delayed.
[Lear] We were never able to find out what the experiment is all about except
that we have been externally corrected about 65 times. And they, the aliens,
refer to us as "Containers." There's been speculation that the souls our bodies
contain are the reason for the experiments. But nothing's been proven or
[Bassett] The scenario itself states that soul "containers" are a matter of
"speculation," and not "proven" or "determined." On such speculation is the
most important information in human history to be withheld from 99.9999% of the
human race? We have been corrected 65 times? Good. One can only imagine how
bad human behavior might be if there had been no corrections.
[Lear] Since 1938 we've lost over 200 aircraft due to UFO hostilities and
thousands of soldiers in all kinds of different actions with aliens. Since that
time several hundred thousand civilians have disappeared with no trace.
[Bassett] We lost more aircraft in World War II, and at least the families knew
why. Several hundred thousand civilians have disappeared in that time frame
without alien assistance. Missing people, while tragic, is not new or
[Lear] Several thousand of those were eliminated by us because of their chance
encounters with the aliens which we could ill afford to have publicized.
[Bassett] This would be a bitter pill. However, since "us" means that humans
committed these atrocities and not "all powerful aliens," the disclosure process
would open the way to ending such actions.
[Lear] A slightly more frightening phenomena known as "human mutilations" have
occurred on a regular basis and are similar to "cattle mutilations". In that the
human or humans are taken from the street, so to speak, and returned to the same
area about 45 minutes to an hour later with their rectums cored out, their
genitals removed, eyes removed from their sockets, and completely drained of
blood. In all cases it appeared that the mutilation procedures occurred while
the persons were still alive and conscious. One of our scientists speculates
that apparently the human specimens had to be alive for the samples to be worth
[Bassett] This is perhaps the least likely segment of the scenario to be
valid. However, if true, it would be a challenge to the public perception of
safety and create serious questions regarding the social contract. It is also
true we can't stop terrorism and will likely live with it indefinitely. Who
would advocate withholding all information of terrorist threats from the public
in order to keep them calm? Thus, when large planes fly through office
windows, the mess would be cleaned up and all would quickly dismiss the event as
odd but unworthy of explanation? More importantly, who can truly estimate the
defensive power of 260 million people focused on specific measures? Further,
these kinds of "awful truth" examples are predicated on aliens as not simply
"all powerful," but "godlike." If this were true, one might wonder why it is
that such all powerful, godlike beings have a disconcerting habit of crashing to
the ground, being picked up by military retrieval teams and hauled off to secret
bases dead on arrival?
[Lear] Abductions occur on a daily basis throughout the United States to at
least 10% of the population.
[Bassett] The 10% figure would raise some eyebrows, but the abduction
phenomenon is being discussed on Oprah Winfrey. Again, it is assumed that total
awareness of such a circumstance by an entire nation offers no relief. Such a
case has not been made in this scenario.
[Lear] When we were first made aware this we protested to the little gray being
we had held in captivity at the YY-2 facility in Los Alamos, but a deal was
struck that in exchange for advanced technology from the aliens we would allow
them to abduct a very small number of persons and we would periodically be given
a list of those persons abducted. We got something less than the technology we
bargained for and found the abductions exceeded by a million fold than what we
had naively agreed to.
[Bassett] Sounds a little like the NAFTA deal. Thanks to the need to maintain
the cover-up, much of the technology is being withheld from full public use.
Thus, the public gets shortchanged twice. The people will be angry. They will
want to replace some government personnel. It's about time.
[Lear] In 1954, President Eisenhower met with a representative of another alien
species at Muroc Test Center, which is now called Edwards Air Force Base. This
alien suggested that they could help us get rid of the Grays but Eisenhower
turned down their offer because they offered no technology.
[Bassett] Perhaps a well informed public might persuade another president to
take that deal.
[Lear] At this point it became apparent to all involved that there was no such
thing as a God, at least how the public perceives God. Certainly some form of
computer recorder stores information and an occasional miracle is displayed by
the aliens to influence a religious event.
[Bassett] The implication here is that this information would cause people to
turn away from God. It is more likely to turn people toward God "It became
apparent" is not exactly a convincing measure of certitude. Many things will
become apparent to many people, assuming, of course, they are included. The
influencing of religion would be an interesting component. It would take far
more specifics than what is presented here to sway committed members of formal
religions. And alien miracles aside, unless these fine off-planet beings can
explain their whereabouts prior to the big bang, those comfortable with a
creator god will have no trouble incorporating these interfering imps into their
[Lear] This so unnerved Eisenhower that he had "In God We Trust" put on paper
money and coins and put in the Pledge of Allegiance to reaffirm the public
belief in God. Shortly after this it was determined in meetings between the US
and the Russians that the situation was serious enough that a cold war should be
manufactured as a ruse to divert attention of the public away from UFOs towards
some other scary threat like the H-bomb. It was also decided to keep the ruse
secret from any elected or appointed officials within both the US and Russian
governments as it took so long to vet these officials and the ruse was easier to
manage if the top people didn't know about it.
[Bassett] A manufactured war? Has there been any other kind? One might
consider a disclosure process aiming to put the government back into truth
business and break down the walls of the secret empire, would be a good start
toward preventing more "manufactured" wars and other edifices of government
propaganda and manipulation. How does encouraging and expanding the "black
world" decrease the disruption of the actions of the "black world?" This is
akin to not telling someone they have cancer in order to spare them the anxiety,
while a cure is available to save them.
[Lear] In the late 1950's NASA was formed to compartmentalize, containerize,
and sanitize information from all space platforms and vehicles. We sold NASA to
the public claiming that all information would belong to them but they got very
little and even that was highly sanitized.
[Bassett] The dilemma and corruption of NASA is being dissected on several
hundred websites. Again, only disclosure will open the door to reforming this
[Lear] Our first efforts were to keep the public from learning about Venus. A
very similar planet to Earth and it's population is very similar to us and just
as technologically advanced. We have learned a lot from them. Starting with the
Russian Venera 1 and US Mariner 2, we made Venus look like a lead melting,
volcanic surface, spewing sulfuric acid into a pressurized atmosphere 90 times
that of Earth. And as often the case we overdid it, and we wondered why nobody
asked how a parachute survived a descent into 800-degree air.
[Bassett] Certainly, present life on another planet would be profoundly
exciting. But given the 25-year public interest in Mars artifacts, a populated
Venus might be anticlimactic. Again, the public has clearly shown its belief
that UFOs are extraterrestrial craft piloted by extraterrestrials. If some are
Venusians, this does not add much to their charisma. Should they be Venus bound
and not space faring, they would just be our harmless neighbors.
[Lear] We set up operations in Pine Gap, Australia to preclude any prying eyes
figuring out what we were up to. We regularly eliminated through extreme
prejudice anybody who was part of the operation and made the least little tiny
threat about disclosure or dissatisfaction with the operation.
[Bassett] Again, these are the actions of humans which disclosure might prevent
in the future.
[Lear] Any space mission that included Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Mariner,
Voyager, Clementine, and all the rest. All data initially came transmitted to
Pine Gap then it was relayed to JPL or wherever after sanitizing. We had a
little trouble with amateur radio operators but we figured out how they could
intercept these signals but we managed to deal with that.
[Bassett] Sequestered transmissions and the treatment of space data as
classified is generally known, and the public assumes the government operates
[Lear] When the Russian threat began to fade we introduced Vietnam which kept
the public occupied for over ten years. The cover up and personnel to run the
operation began to get bigger and bigger and required more and more money. We
were forced to inflate the defense budget, which soon not enough. Then we got
into the drug business which was still not enough. We were the ones that looted
the savings and loan industry and Wall Street to boot.
[Bassett] The tragedy of Vietnam, expanding black budget, growing defense
expenditures, government involvement in drug smuggling and the savings and loan
fiasco are all known to the public and were covered by the media. They are all
outrageous in their own right. Learning they were tied in some way to
alternative agendas such as the UFO cover-up may increase, but will not
multiply, the outrage.
[Lear] It is so out of control now most people want immunity and want out.
[Bassett] Good. Grant them immunity and let them out.
[Lear] But there is so much secrecy and so many double and triple blinds in
place that it's unlikely that this thing can ever be dismantled.
[Bassett] The question presented by the scenario was to disclose or not to
disclose. It was not about how difficult the truth process would be. Life is
difficult. Good government is difficult. Major change is difficult. Failure
to rise to the difficult is how nations and empires fall. Abraham Lincoln
believed America could only fall from the inside, not form outside forces. Such
an outcome could only be accomplished with intense secrecy and systemic lying -
exactly the circumstances evolving since 1947.
[Lear] And even if you give us the go ahead to spill the beans to the public
it's unlikely they will get anything more than "yes, we recovered a flying
saucer and yes, there was an occupant" but that's all we're gonna tell ya.
[Bassett] Ah, but this is exactly the definition of disclosure: the formal
acknowledgment of the extraterrestrial presence. Whatever else is learned is
between the people and the government. It is a political process. There are
no guarantees, and the public might, contrary to the fundamental tenet of this
scenario, go right back to sleep - hit the snooze button. But they must have
[Lear] So go ahead and roll the tape for Mr. Bell. What you see here is what
human mutilations look like. That one was a male about 27 years old. That one is
film of dead aliens being pulled from the wreckage of a craft that crashed in
Olancha, California in the '50s. That craft you see over there was over 250ft.
in diameter and had to be buried on the spot. That site is in Utah near Dugway
Proving Grounds. The object you're looking at now is the as the Kecksburg Acorn
which was brought to Wright Patt in the middle '60s. There's Frank Drake trying
to force information out of a being tied down to a stretcher. He was supposedly
from Tao Ceti.
[Bassett] Unless the production values are very good, this film is going
straight to video. Most kids today will find the video record doesn't measure
up to the special effects standards of last year's game cube.
[Lear] These pictures you're looking at now are structures on the Moon. That's
the tower in Sinus Medii and it's over seven miles tall. And that thing over
there is what we call the Colossus of Oguram(sp) in Mare Crisium. We don't know
what it does but the machine itself is bigger than Brooklyn, New York. Now those
are videos of the domes covering the craters. As you can see, some are in a very
advanced state of decay.
[Bassett] This is old news. These issues have been in play for three
decades. In general, artifacts on the Moon or Mars representing long past
entities are the safest and least disruptive kind of information the public can
[Lear] These are 5 second slides of the 18 different alien species we are
looking at. That one there is the most gruesome looking. The guards at one
facility are carefully indoctrinated over several months being shown pictures
similar to but not exactly like the alien. Only when he'd been acclimatized, so
to speak, of the horrible looking beings are they allowed to stand in security
positions. Before these acclimatizations were done, we had two guards die of a
heart attack as the aliens came down the hallway unexpectedly.
[Bassett] That's what happens when you don't tell people what is going on.
The cover-up is scarier than the truth. Since the aliens can pretty much come
and go as they please, it might be nice if the people knew they were here, just
to keep those heart attacks to a minimum should they decide to drop in
unannounced on the Larry King Show.
[Lear] And this last clip is of the Kennedy assassination. You've heard of the
second gunman theory? Well, this is the second camera that recorded exactly what
happened and we had 4 gunmen. And the bottom line was that Kennedy had to go. He
insisted on releasing what little alien information we had told him about and he
was trying to withdraw troops from Vietnam which we were using as a diversion
for the public.
[Bassett] The only people upset about this will be the legion of authors with
Kennedy conspiracy books in galleys with the wrong theory. The public will
appreciate finally knowing the truth. Actually, multiply that appreciation by
all the truths to be found, once the fear of looking is put aside.
[Lear] After Kennedy we never told any President anything. Nixon knew because
he was briefed as VP in 1952. That's how we knew where to take Jackie Gleason to
Homestead Air Force Base to see the alien bodies we had in storage there.
[Bassett] What an odd America the secrecy cabal wants - a place where the
greatest scientists in the world must be kept in the dark for their own good,
while a television comic gets to see alien bodies. While this is compatible
with a paradigm where Arnold Schwarzenegger becomes governor of California and
Dennis Miller has to ward off demands he run for the Senate, do you really want
to say "no" to disclosure and maintain such a status quo?
There you have it. When you break it down, it doesn't seem so frightening, does
it? Other scenarios are out there. Break them down as well. The answer
will be the same.
No disrespect is aimed at John Lear. All of these responses are debatable.
But at the core of the most profound transition in history is a question being
asked of every living human, whether they are as yet aware or not: do you want
to build your life and your nation with truths or lies?
History has been quite consistent on the outcomes. Those who choose lies are
diminished or even destroyed. Those who choose truths persevere or even
UFO's are NOT Artifact Attractions! If you see one RUN or be ready to
proclaim the Name of Jesus! Rebuke them in His Name as a child of God!
If you have Jesus/Yahshuah as your Saviour you can prevent and stop
abductions before they even start! See I Need Jesus
To Be Informed, is to be Forewarned, and Forearmed with the Power of
Paradigm Research Group
4938 Hampden Lane, #161
Bethesda, MD 20814